Professional standards legislation Institute schemes Liability What liability is capped, occupational liability, membership and services issues, when liability is capped Who benefits from the cap? Participating members, practice entity membership, exclusion of AFS licenses Professional indemnity cover Institute PI requirements, minimum cap and limitation amount/monetary ceiling Disclosure Form of disclosure & Business stationery
Professional standards legislation Professional standards legislation (PSL) is now in force in all Australian jurisdictions. This legislation enables the Professional Standards Council (PSC) to approve a scheme which will limit the civil liability of members of a professional association in exchange for a commitment that the members will hold professional indemnity cover of a certain standard and the association will work to improve professional standards of members. The legislation- Defines what liability is capped
- Sets out who can benefit from the cap – i.e persons to whom the scheme applies
- Sets out the requirements for a person to get the benefit of the cap
- Professional indemnity cover to limitation amount
- Disclosure on business stationery in some states/territories
- Prohibits opting out or contracting out
Institute schemes The schemes themselves set out the details of how the cap will apply to members. They specify:- Which members will benefit (participating members)
- The minimum caps
- The way in which the caps above the minimum cap are calculated (limitation amount) up to the ultimate cap which is called the monetary ceiling.
- The circumstances when a member may apply to the Institute to apply its discretion to specify a higher maximum amount of liability than is set out in the scheme.
Back to top Liability PSL limits occupational liability and excludes from the capping schemes liability for damages in certain cases. All jurisdictions exclude liability for death or personal injury to a person, breach of trust and fraud or dishonesty. SA and Tasmania legislation excludes liability for an intentional tort. Occupational liability A key element of the legislation is that it provides that liability can only be limited for occupational liability (i.e. the act or omission of a member acting in the performance of his/her occupation). The court will decide whether the act or omission is that of an Institute member on the basis of the circumstances in each case. To ensure that they are not exposed to unlimited liability, members should ensure that all persons and entities against whom a claim might be made are Institute members. The court will also decide whether an activity is one which is 'in the performance of his or her occupation' as a member of the Institute. In deciding whether a service meets this definition, the court is likely to look at all relevant evidence that the service is one that is generally accepted as being within the scope of services provided by the accounting profession. This evidence might include the definition of 'public accountancy services' in article 2(f) of the Institute's Supplemental Royal Charter. Liability arising from breach of Commonwealth legislation In October 2007, the Commonwealth prescribed the New South Wales and Western Australia schemes. Under the Treasury Legislation Amendment (Professional Standards) Act 2004, the operation of a state scheme will be extended to cover liability arising from breaches of the Trade Practices Act 1974(Cth) where that scheme has been prescribed by the Commonwealth. The SA, NT, Qld, ACT and Victorian schemes have been prescribed from 12 June 2008 to 12 June 2009. The Institute has been advised that the schemes have been prescribed for this limited time on the basis that professioanl standards policy is currently under consideration by the Commonwealth. No further details have been provided by The Commonwealth. Liability arising in another jurisdiction PSL is state based legislation, intended to limit the occupational liability of a member in relation to a claim or cause of action in that state, or jurisdiction. When the NSW Accountants Scheme was operative, it was only members resident in NSW who were participating members of that scheme. When is liability capped? Under PSL, liability is limited in relation to an act or omission which occurred from the date of commenccement, during the period when the scheme is in force regardless of whether the scheme ceased to be in force at the time when the proceedings are instituted. Schemes have now commenced in all states and territories except Tasmania. Follow this link for the commencement date in your state or territory? FAQs - What liability is limited? Back to top Who benefits from the cap? Participating members The Institute schemes specify CPP holders, affiliate and practice entity members, other than financial services licensees as participating members of the schemes. The schemes apply to all CPP holders including those members who hold a nil rate or concessional CPP. Members who hold a financial services license are excluded from the limitation of liability in relation to all services provided, including those which do not require an AFS license. If the act or omission is that of a member that act or omission is within the scope of services provided by the accounting profession and adequate PI cover is held then the following participating members get the benefit of the cap:- CPP holders & affiliate or practice entity members other than AFS licensees who are partners of the participating member
- Non-member partners and employees as long as they are not entitled to membership
If the act or omission is that of a non-member then the liability is unlimited and members will not get the benefit of the cap on liability. Practice entity membership PSL in all jurisdictions now applies to incorporated entities. Members providing services through incorporated entities or other structures against which proceedings might be brought should consider practice entity membership for those entities. This will ensure that where the entity is the primary defendant in any proceedings, as a member the entity and its officers will get the benefit of the cap on liability. It should be noted that not all practice entities through which a member chooses to practice are capable of becoming practice entity members. The entity must be capable of utilising the description 'Chartered Accountants' in accordance with the Institute's regulations. Institute approval of a form of practice structure prior to 2007 does not constitute approval of practice entity membership. Read more information about practice entity membership here FAQs - Who gets the benefit of the cap? Back to top Professional indemnity (PI) insurance cover PSL requires that to get the benefit of the limitation of liability, members must be able to satisfy the court that they have the benefit of PI cover and/or business assets to the level of the cap for the service, which is the basis of the cause of action. Because of the risks associated with relying on business assets the Institute requires that all CPP holders and affiliate and practice entity members hold adequate PI cover. The scheme sets out the amount of cover each member or practice will need. Institute PI requirements The Institute's Regulation on PI, Appendix to Regulation 4 has been amended as follows: 7PI.3.5 The Limit of Indemnity (i) The sum insured for the Practice must be: (a) not less than either the limitation amount or monetary ceiling set out in the Institute scheme current at the time of PI policy renewal or, in a state where there is no limitation of liability scheme in place, (b) not less than $500,000 PI Calculator To help clarify the minimum limit of professional indemnity (PI) cover you need to hold (to comply with the Institute's requirements). Link to the online calculator. Minimum cap The PSL provides that liability for damages will only be limited where the damages exceed the minimum caps specified in the Institute scheme for all categories of service as follows:- $500k to 30 June 2008
- $750k from 1 July 2008 to 30 June 2009
- $1m From 1 July 2009
These minimum caps apply where the engagement fee for the relevant service is less than $50k up to 30 June 2008, $75k from 1 July 2008 to 30 June 2009 and $100k from 1 July 2009. This minimum cap on liability also represents the minimum level of PI cover required to get the benefit of the cap on liability and also to meet the requirements of the Institute’s Regulation 7PI.3.5. Limitation amount Beyond the minimum cap, the Institute schemes set out the limitation amount and monetary ceiling according to the category of service provided. More> Engagement fee Both the limitation amount and the level of PI cover required are based on a multiple of the engagement fee. However, PSL provides that the court will decide whether the fee charged is based on a ‘reasonable charge for the services provided’. In making this decision, the court must have regard to any amount actually charged and the amount that a competent person of the same qualifications and experience as the participant would be likely to charge in the same circumstances. It is likely that the terms of a members’ engagement letter would be an significant circumstance to which the court would have regard in determining whether a charge for services was reasonable. Timing issues The scheme limits liability in relation to services provided after the commencement of the scheme. When deciding on the level of PI cover required, members should consider the risks associated with uncapped services provided prior to this date and the statutory limitation period which applies to those uncapped services. FAQs - PI requirements. Back to top Disclosure Requirements PSL in all states and territories requires that all documents provided by a member whose liability is limited by a scheme to a client or prospective client must carry a statement to that effect. Regulations in New South Wales, Western Australia, South Australia and Queensland have prescribed the form of the disclosure statement as: 'Liability limited by a scheme approved under Professional Standards Legislation' * The Institute recommends that this form of wording be adopted by members in jurisdictions where the form of notification is not prescribed. Where the business stationery of a practice is shared with an AFS licensee within the practice, the Institute recommends that the following be added to the above disclosure. *Other than for the acts or omissions of financial services licensees Consequences of non disclosure Under Victorian, Queensland, Northern Territory and Tasmanian legislation, a scheme does not limit the liability of a member if this disclosure is not provided. This impacts the schemes in Victoria, Queensland and the Northern Territory. No scheme has been approved in Tasmania. Under PSL in all states, failure to provide the disclosure of the member's limitation of liability under the scheme constitutes an offence carrying a penalty. For example, in NSW the maximum penalty is $5,500, in WA and the ACT it is $5,000 and in SA it is a maximum penalty of $20,000. Business stationery Further guidance on disclosure FAQs – Disclosure of limitation of liability Back to top
|
|